In 2026, Nacha, the organization overseeing the ACH network in the US, is implementing new mandatory fraud monitoring requirements designed to address the threat of authorized/unauthorized credit-push payments fraud. These requirements are the culmination of the lessons learned during the COVID-era of widespread government disbursement fraud and other scams, such as:
The rule does not require these organizations to screen all individual ACH entries they send or receive, but to ensure they are employing a risk-based approach to fraud monitoring. The intention is to give organizations the flexibility to customize their monitoring processes to the level of risk posed by the various types of ACH entries they process. However, the rule makes it clear that organizations cannot conclude that no monitoring is necessary. In other words, they cannot sit idly and do nothing.
Nacha’s new fraud monitoring rules require:
Effective Dates
A Guide for Financial Services Organizations
Nacha’s explicit name, calling this “risk-based,” means that it lacks prescriptive recommendations, allowing each participant to customize the polices and procedures it feels are sufficient to comply with this rule based on the organization’s size, complexity, and risk appetite. It’s likely that your organization already has fraud prevention policies and procedures in place today. Your goal should be to document these controls, evaluate their effectiveness, and look for solutions to bridge any identified gaps. Additionally, here are some steps you could implement to prepare and be compliant:
1 – Conduct a Risk Assessment
2 – Implement or Upgrade Fraud Monitoring Tools
Some risk-based approaches can monitor for:
The rule does not explicitly require receiving institutions to monitor every ACH entry it receives. For many institutions, that would be an overwhelming task. Receivers can utilize a risk-based approach to isolate high-risk entries such as:
Entries that use an SEC code that does not correspond with the Receiver’s account type (i.e., consumer vs. non-consumer account).
Out-of the ordinary large dollar entries
Utilization of the standardized Company Entry Descriptions of “PAYROLL” and “PAYMENT” to help determine fraudulent activity
The receiving FI could then employ name matching of the entry to the receiver’s account name to flagged/suspicious entries as an additional factor in determining fraudulent activity.
3 – Define Response Procedures
4 – Train and Educate Staff
5 – Test and Audit Regularly
Wespay Advisors Can Help Ensure You’re Ready
Wespay Advisors can be your partner in preparing for compliance with this new rule. Whether you’re designing a fraud monitoring program from scratch or are looking for expert feedback to evaluate your current controls, Wespay Advisors can:
Wespay Advisors’ team is eager to partner with you to help ensure you and your account holders are ready for this new rule.
Want to find out more? View our ACH Fraud Rule page, or pick up the phone or email:
John Curtis, AAP, APRP, NCP
SVP, Business Consulting Leader
415-373-1190
[email protected]
© 2025 Wespay Advisors. All rights reserved.